A Study in Contrast: TheRylands v Fletcher Argument




Affiliate Disclaimer

As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases. We get commissions for purchases made through links on this website from Amazon and other third parties.

Introduction: It’s the ultimate debate, and it’s one that will determine the future of UX. Join us as we take a closer look at the Rylands v Fletcher argument, and see which side is right.

What is the Rylands v Fletcher Argument?

The Rylands v Fletcher Argument is a legal case that concerned the interpretation of the UK’s Equal Opportunity Act. The issue at hand was whether a company could be sued for discrimination based on their race, even if they had no intention of discriminating against any specific race.

The Fletcher Argument: Why Did the Court Rule in the Rylands Case?

The Fletcher Arguments were that because the equal opportunity act was passed in 1964, companies must take affirmative action to overcome any past discrimination or unlawful discrimination that may have occurred. This means that any company that has been discriminatory in the past must take corrective action, even if they do not currently discriminate against any specific race. In order to make this determination, the court looked at several factors including how long ago such behavior took place, what type of company it was, and whether there was an impact on public policy.

What is the Fletcher Argument?

The Fletcher argument is the contention that the US Constitution does not allow for a separation of church and state. The issue at stake, in this case, was whether the First Amendment of the US Constitution protected religious freedom within the government. In order to make this claim, the defendants argued that the government must be neutral towards all religions, as specified by Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution.

The Fletcher Argument: Why Did the Court Rule in the Fletcher Case?

The decision in the Fletcher case was based on a two-pronged argument- first, that religion is a personal matter between an individual and their god or deity, and second, that state neutrality cannot be based on religious beliefs.

What is the Fletcher Argument?

The Fletcher Argument is a legal argument made by Judge John W. Fletcher in the case of Ryland v. Fletcher, which determined that the copyrights of works created by two people cannot be registered with the government. The issue at hand was whether or not a work can be considered a “work of authorship” and be protected under copyright law.

The Fletcher Argument: Why Did the Court Rule in the Fletcher Case?

The decision in Fletcher was based on the premise that copyrights are granted to works of authorship, which is defined as “a creative work created by one person.” This rule applies regardless of who created the work, as long as it falls within the scope of copyright law.


The Fletcher Argument is the issue in the Rylands v Fletcher case. The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, who was successful in proving that they were not misled by their supplier into thinking they were getting a better product than they actually were. This argument can be used to prove any type of deception or unfair business practice.

About the author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest posts

  • Occupiers: What You Don’t Know About Your Rights

    Introduction: As an occupier, you have a lot on your plate. You have to protect yourself and your rights, while also making sure that the occupiers are getting the attention they need. But without understanding your rights, it’s hard to know where to start. This guide will help you get started, but you should also…

    Read more

  • The courage to be brave: A guide to living a life that is brave

    Introduction: As we continue to live in a society that is ever-more afraid and fearful, it can be difficult to find courage. We’re constantly bombarded with messages telling us how to be fearless, and it sounds like a great idea on the surface. However, being brave requires more than just following these Guidelines. It takes…

    Read more